[Advaita-l] Difficulty with Akhandakara Vrtti
ravikiranm108 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 27 22:45:45 CDT 2015
> Add to it that, although brahman is not fala-vyApya, it is accepted as
> vRtti-vyApya, and hence it's knowledge causes similar expression as 'I know
> brahman'. If it doesn't then you are accepting that GYAnI doesn't know that
> he knows brahman.
> The expression that brahman can't be said to be known, just means that
> brahman can't be said to be illumined by others.
> So, there is no difference.
> All vRttti-GYAna-s are sakhaNDa in the sense you and others are talking.
> And, the brahman, which is pure knowledge/consciousness, although akhaNDa
> is not aGYAna-virodhI. So, you can't say that ghaTa-GYAna is vRtti-rUpa and
> hence skhaNDa, but brahmaGYAna is one with brahman and hence akhaNDa, too.
ghaTa is illumined by the chidabhAsa to have ghaTa GYAna ( ignorance of
the adhiSThAna Brahman where all such GYAna occurs is not removed - bhedam
( ajnAna of Brahma svarUpa) remains as ever before)
While, in case of brahmaGYAna, where it is direct illumination, such bhedam
is removed resulting in jivAtma paramAtma ekatva jnAna ...
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list