[Advaita-l] Difficulty with Akhandakara Vrtti

Ravi Kiran ravikiranm108 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 19 01:37:30 CDT 2015


On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:00 PM, श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <
lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> *श्रीमल्ललितालालितः*www.lalitaalaalitah.com
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Ravi Kiran <ravikiranm108 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:36 AM, श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <
>> lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Ravi Kiran <ravikiranm108 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, used in the sense, knowledge arises when vastu is perceived..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ​How could you justify this?
>>> By differentiating meaning of knowledge and perception? Is it possible?​
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, can we say, if seeing a vastu is perception and knowing the vastu
>> subsequently is the knowledge
>>
>
> ​And, what do you mean by 'seeing' apart from it's knowledge generated by
> eyes?
> You are just changing words without considering sameness of their meanings.
>>
>
>> ... though all happens instantaneously and cannot be differentiated
>> likewise when perception takes place, unless one analyzes the cognition
>> process with the help of the vedAnta books/works.
>>
>
> ​Not like that.
> We don't differentiate like you said.
> We don't accept two perceptions or knowledges.
> The best you can do is to replace 'seeing' as ​
>
> ​'contact of eyes with pot'.
> But, then it will not fit the original sentence you used. You used 'GYAna
> give knowledge'. That just reveals lack of viveka of meanings of those two
> words. I know that GYAna = knowledge, is that correct!!??
>
Yes


> But, you were using as if they were different
>

I see the incorrectness of the expression

>
> We maintain that,
> *If you can't propound it clearly, then you don't have proper knowledge of
> subject. You may have ApAta-pratipatti(partial knowledge) which need to be
> polished by questioning your belief.*
> And, please mind that *Every word you say is important. You should be
> able to tell the sense in which you used the word in a particular sentence.
> If you can't, then either you don't know correct meaning of the word/ or
> your whole concept(conveyed by the sentence) is wrong.*
>

Yes, got it ..understand the importance of accuracy and precision..

Thanks

>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> *श्रीमल्ललितालालितः*www.lalitaalaalitah.com
>>>
>>
>>
>


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list