[Advaita-l] Result of karma where result is not mentioned

श्रीमल्ललितालालितः lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com
Thu Dec 24 07:38:31 CST 2015

There are three adhikaraNa-s of mImAmsA related to this issue directly :
1st establishes that those karma-s where we don't hear any result, are also
2nd says that those karma-s have single result, because only that much is
enough to make them falavat(fruitful).
3rd concludes that it is svarga which is sukha devoid of duHkha.
These are 4.3.5-6-7.

If you could look at them, fine.
Otherwise, I may write a little on this.

BTW, I may not be able to use correct English words due to my limitations.
So, please ignore them and reach the implied meaning as you do with words
of a child. This applies to my past, present and future posts.


On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Praveen R. Bhat via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> hariH oM.
> Namaste all,
> I had heard in the context of arthasaMgraha that wherever a result is not
> mentioned for shruti-prescribed karma, such as nityakarma, pUrva mimAMsakas
> take it as svargaH. Is this view correct and if so, where is such a view
> mentioned?
> If not, could someone guide me onto what pUrva mimAMsA says in this regard?
> Thanks much,
> --Praveen R. Bhat
> /* Through what should one know That owing to which all this is known!
> [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org

More information about the Advaita-l mailing list