svidyasankar at hotmail.com
Tue Oct 29 12:01:35 CDT 2013
A little correction. Proper vyAkaraNa demands that I should have written, "etasyArthaH spashTo na vA?"
The word artha, as used in this construction, should be masculine in saMskRta, whereas I assumed it could be used as a neuter noun as well, the way it is used in Tamil and Telugu. My thanks to Sri V Subrahmanian for the emendation.
>spaShTam bhoH! dhanyavaadaH. pUrvameva likhitam Aseet.
On Oct 27, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Vidyasankar Sundaresan <svidyasankar at hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sri Jayakumar,
tatraiva paSyatu bhavAn - "He had read out the portion of his work dealing with the first five padas of the brahmasUtras once before to Sankara."
etasyArthaM spashTam, na vA?
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list