[Advaita-l] A reference needed
rama.balasubramanian at gmail.com
Tue Oct 15 03:36:15 CDT 2013
It must be AbhAsa vAda. Refer to panchadashI 8.42 and up. I don't think he
calls it the AbhAsa-vAda (quick scan), but refers to the cidAbhAsa. The
unique thing about this is that the jahallakShaNA is used by Sri VidyAraNya
to interpret the mahAvAkya tat-tvam-asi instead of the usual
Madhusudana Saraswati also advocates this view in the siddhAntabindu, but
prefers the jahad-ajahal-lakShaNA. It's a small variation of the
bimba-pratibimba-vAda. The differences between all these kinds of
"vAda"s are fairly minor. It's better to concentrate the message instead of
these kinds of packaging (just my opinion).
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, kuntimaddi sadananda wrote:
> I just recived a request from a Swaminiji regarding the reference in
> Swamini is such a ridiculous word.
> - Subbuji and others who are familiar with Pachadasi can
>> direct Swamini with proper reference since I have no idea what ahaasa
>> vaada Swami Dayanandaji is referring to.
> Surely it is a typo for adhyasa?
> Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.**org/archives/advaita-l/<http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list