[Advaita-l] Concluding stotra of "siddanta bindu"

[Sunil Bhattacharjya]

Namaste,

Quote
Why, Madhusdana has to devalue the vEda vyAsa who happens to be one of 
the chief acharya of advaita parampara by making a sweeping remark that 
vyAsa couldn't explain
Unquote


Kindly do not forget that Madhusudana Saraswati must have known  it well that  Badarayana Vyasa was different from Krishna Dwapayana Vedavyasa (Parashari Vyasa) ?

Regards,
Sunil KB



________________________________
 From: Venkata sriram P <venkatasriramp at yahoo.in>
To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org 
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 7:56 AM
Subject: [Advaita-l] Concluding stotra of "siddanta bindu"
 

Namaste,
 
///
 
Sri.Madhusudana Saraswathi by his remarks has answered the critics 
who said that Veda vyasa has not written vedanta in his Brahma sutras
 
//
 
So, should i conclude with the idea of Sri Madhusudana that:
 
1) vyAsa's brahma sUtra doesn't clearly define advaita ?
 
2) vyAsa couldn't explain the vEdAnta as perfectly as sankara ?
 
3) Was vyAsa was less intelligent as compared to sankara ?
 
4) was it an arthavAda prayOga towards the sankara's brilliant commentary on sUtra so much so that it has outwitted even the original sUtra of vyAsa ?
 
5) Sankara filled the gaps by writing commentary and explained the siddhAnta which vyAsa couldn't do so ?
 
Why, Madhusdana has to devalue the vEda vyAsa who happens to be one of the chief acharya of advaita parampara by making a sweeping remark that vyAsa couldn't explain
the siddhAnta properly in his sutra?
 
regs,
sriram
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org