[Advaita-l] Fw: [hc] Reinterpreting Dwaita versus Adwaita by sanjay rao
sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 28 13:51:21 CDT 2012
Do you condone Mani-Manjari's casting aspersions on the character of Adi Sankaracharya's mother? What proof did they have? Everything should be looked at holistically.
From: Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan <rama.balasubramanian at gmail.com>
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Fw: [hc] Reinterpreting Dwaita versus Adwaita by sanjay rao
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:45 PM, V Subrahmanian
<v.subrahmanian at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Sunil Bhattacharjya <
> sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I understand that in the Chapter 22 of the "Mahabharata Taparya Nirnaya"
>> Sri Madhvacharya had tried to do character assassination of Adi
>> Sankaracharya by calling the latter as a demon trying to misinterpret the
>> shastras. Has any of our esteemed members seen the above Chaapter 22.
>> Sunil KB
> In the following link one can view/read a few pages from a Kannada book
> titled 'shrI vidyAraNya viShayaka AkShepa nirAsa' authored by Sri
> G.R.Patil, Dharwad. He has excerpted a portion from a Kannada book
> 'MadhvAmRta mahArNava' Edited with Kannada rendering by Prof. Vyasanakere
> PrabhanjanAchArya M.A. and published by Aitareya prakashana , vyAsanakere
> PAjaka, No. 6, 14th Main, BSK Ist Stage, Bangalore 560 050. The book
> published in 1992 carries a note: 'This book is for the use of Vaishnavas'.
> I am giving a few sample English translations from the excerpt:
> verse 118: Whoever says 'namaskar' by joining his palms to a Madhwa-hater
> has to be punished by severing his arms and casting them into the ocean.
> verse 164:
> हत्वा त्ववैष्णवं विप्रं प्रायश्चित्तं न कारयेत् ।
> तेन तुष्यति मध्वेशः प्रायश्चित्तं तु निष्फलम् ॥
> [Upon killing a non-vaiShNava brahmin one need not perform any expiatory
> rites (prAyashcitta). By such a killing the Lord of Madhva will only be
> pleased and therefore the expiatory rite will be useless.]
> Sounds like 'jihad'?
No. For the simple reason that such things never really happened or
were implemented, unlike the real jihad. It is just an exageration for
effect in poetry - something "modern" minds don't seem to understand.
Sankara and Ramanuja quote a verse which says molten lead has to be
poured into the ears of a shudra who has heard the vedas being
recited. Do you think anyone really implemented that? If the previous
one were jihad, what would you call this?
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list