[Advaita-l] Women and Paramahamsa sannyasa
lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com
Sat Mar 17 19:17:11 CDT 2012
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 23:03, V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>wrote:
> > Or,
> > veda-vyAsa mentioned buddha, chArvAka, etc. also. So are they also
> > followers of vaidika-rules and nyAya-s of mImAMsA on account of being
> > mentioned by him ?
> Veda vyAsa has mentioned buddha, etc. as pUrvapakSha. Everyone knows that
> the sulabhaa story was not meant to be a pUrvapakSha to be refuted.
> Shankara does not consider the sulabhA instance as something avaidika.
He also doesn't say that her tridaNDa-dhAraNa is something vaidika.
Anyway, I've nothing new to say. I need support of shruti-s, smR^iti-s,
etc. to understand your stand. If you have, then we will talk. Otherwise, I
see no use to continue.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list