[Advaita-l] Ishwara Turiya?
rkmurthy at gmail.com
Fri Mar 9 05:22:18 CST 2012
On 9 March 2012 16:18, Rajaram Venkataramani <rajaramvenk at gmail.com> wrote:
<< But the negation of tatastha lakshana of Saguna Brahman does not
negate Saguna Brahman Himself. >>
The point is that saguNatvam itself is taTastha. Once all
visheSha-s/guNa-s are negated, only the nirvisheSha remains.
At the highest level, your expression "taTastha lakShaNa of saguNa
brahman" is self-contradictory.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list