[Advaita-l] Apoureshyatva - Faith or Logic?
v.subrahmanian at gmail.com
Sun Jul 1 20:27:44 CDT 2012
On 7/1/12, Rajaram Venkataramani <rajaramvenk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sri Sunil,
But > we know for certain that the idea of paureshyatvam was put forward by
> Buddhists and Jainas. We also Kanada puts forth that view and so does
> Gautama. Their preceptors might have held that view for a long time before
> them. But we dont have any literary evidence to support that. So, the
> conclusion is that VedApaureshyatvam is an ancient opinion that came under
> attack in the last 2500 - 2800 years.
In the Chandogya Upanishad and some other places we encounter an
'asadvAda' which Shankara identifies as that of 'Bauddha'. Some years
ago I asked a knowledgeable person: If this is the Buddhist school,
do we conclude that the Bauddhas existed even before the Veda? But we
all understand that Gautama Buddha is a historical figure.' The reply
I got was - Even though Gautama Buddha is a historical entity, the
'vAda' attributed to him or propounded by him has existed for ever.
That is the reason we find it being taken up as a pUrvapakSha even in
the Veda. It is only possible that Gautama Buddha articulated it at
that point in history.'
So, that leaves us with the thinking: The opposition to the Veda
apauruSheyatva has been existing for ever and that Veda apauruSheyatva
has been held/upheld by the Vedantin for ever. What we see as
Badarayana or Jaimini are only names/individuals that appeared and
disappeared even as Gautama Buddha appeared and disappeared in
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list