[Advaita-l] Apaurusheyatva of Vedas.
lalitaalaalitah at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 17:43:13 CDT 2011
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:04, kuntimaddi sadananda <
kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sir - abaadhita is already implied in the very pramANa definition. Thanks
> for pointing out that I missed to restate again.
To be clear, I was pointing that apauruSheyatva is needed for veda to be
pramANa and nothing else.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list