[Advaita-l] Apaurusheyatva of Vedas.

श्रीमल्ललितालालितः lalitaalaalitah at gmail.com
Mon Sep 12 09:11:04 CDT 2011

Not saying words of totaka vedas is enough for my relief.
I've skipped rest of your post.
On Sep 12, 2011 7:31 PM, "Rajaram Venkataramani" <rajaramvenk at gmail.com>
> 2011/9/12 श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <lalitaalaalitah at gmail.com>
>> Some one told that vedas were revealed to totakacarya......
>> You are no different from others in not understanding the topic.
>> Are words of toTakAcArya vedas ?
>> We are talking about validity of vedas as cause of valid knowledge and
>> of knowledge or anything else.
> * I did not say that the words of Totakacharya are Vedas. My point is that
> vedas, as sabda brahman, exist without ANY dependency on an external
> to know them and can be revealed to someone without formal means of
> such as rote. We have contemporary examples of that and cited Totakacharya
> as a classic example. If knowledge is not an entity, it cannot be given.
> knowledge will only be a memory of an experience as in mundane learning. *
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org

More information about the Advaita-l mailing list