[Advaita-l] Apaurusheyatva of Vedas.
omkar_deshpande at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 9 13:47:06 CDT 2011
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 22:27, Omkar Deshpande wrote:
I am aware of an argument that parataH-prAmANya leads to an infinite regress, but that does not apply to the third option above, since pratyakSha is at the root. What do you think about this?
<<<This too was intended by me as parataH-prAmANya-vAda.
Now, you know my reply already.>>>
Even if we call the third option I mentioned (where shabda and anumAna derive their validity from pratyakSha) by the name of parataH-prAmANya, I don't know why svataH-prAmANya is preferable to it, especially given that there is no infinite regress now. How would you argue that?
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list