[Advaita-l] Modern science and Vedanta.
Br. Pranipata Chaitanya
pranipata at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 21 07:47:48 CDT 2011
> When madhusUdanaji says 'tat shabda ananvayAt'; why 'tat' is changed to
> 'tatra' in your prediction.
> >The objection of MS is for the missing 'tasmin kAle' or simply 'tatra' in
> >the verse.
I just wanted to know how you arrive at above conclusion. The translation
of gambhIrAnandaji for the sentence ' yatra kAle iti tu vyAkhyAnam asAdhu
tat shabda ananvayAt' reads - 'The explanation of yatra as 'at the time
when' is inappropriate since the word tat, that, stands
isconnected'. --which implies a word 'tat' in the verse is not explained
(not included in the vyAkhyAna) and not some thing is not brought in like
'tatra kAle'. You will also observe that 'yasmin avasthA visheShe' is not
corelated by 'tasmin avasthA visheShe' by madhusUdanaji and hence such
objection will become untenable.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list