[Advaita-l] Meaning required for a shloka on 'arthavAdaH'
v.subrahmanian at gmail.com
Tue Mar 16 00:53:51 CDT 2010
Thank you Vidyashankar ji for the explanation. The 'तद्धानात्’ solution
appeals to me.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Vidyasankar Sundaresan <
svidyasankar at hotmail.com> wrote:
> The only possible interpretation for "taddhAnAt (tat hAnAt)" seems to be
> When there is neither opposition to other pramANas, nor reiteration
> of what has already been established (avadhArita) otherwise, then the
> is a description of things as they are (bhuta-artha).
> > Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:57:16 +0530
> > From: v.subrahmanian at gmail.com
> > To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
> > Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Meaning required for a shloka on 'arthavAdaH'
> > Thank you Vidyashankar ji for the response. I am able to get the three
> > types of arthavAda. However, how do we get the full meaning of the verse,
> > with its anvaya, etc. What is the 'virodha' here that gives rise to the
> > first type: guNa vAda (I suppose this is what is also known as
> > 'stutyarthavAda')? What does 'tat hAnAt' mean in the third type? Is this
> > shloka of the mImAmsaka-s?
> > Regards,
> > subrahmanian.v
> Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list