[Advaita-l] Conference on that Date of Adi Sankaracharya inOctober, 2002
sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 21 09:15:37 CST 2010
My comment was in response what Michael said. I do not know how Michael's mail got deleted. When I said "You have a point" I meant that what Michael pointed out is valid. I mentioned earlier that the Dwarka Math had published a paper in the Journal "Vimarsh", where all the details of Sudhanva's copper inscription had been given. Dwarka Math authorities have kept the Copper inscription in the safe custoy of the Government authorities. I appreciate that as there is danger of that getting destroyed by persons and you can very well guess why.
I think that in search of the vyavaharik truth one has every right to seek clarifications respectfully from any of the Sankara Mathas if one finds any contradictory statements said to be coming out of that Math. Who are not interested in these mundane truths can skip such mails an devote time and energy to seeking the paramarthic truths alone, without loosing their cool.
Sunil K. Bhattacharjya
--- On Thu, 1/21/10, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
From: Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com>
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Conference on that Date of Adi Sankaracharya inOctober, 2002
To: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 2:31 AM
Yes, you have a point.
can we not avoid single line remarks like : thanks, good, you have a point
etc. with a lengthy tail of previous mails ?? IMO, appreciatory or
otherwise single line comments can be addressed directly to the the person
concerned if these remarks not doing any value addition to the on going
thread..is it not?? just a suggestion..moderators discretion is final in
Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list