[Advaita-l] A matter for Adjudication
bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com
Tue Apr 13 07:01:50 CDT 2010
a) that Sri Sachidanandendra Saraswathi and his followers do not say that
Jagadguru Sri Suresvaracharya have not properly understood what Sri
> yes, this is one of those vipareeta grahaNa-s of saMpradAyavAdins :-))
Sri SSS is of the opinion that unlike panchapAdikAkAra, Sri Sureshwara is
near to bhAshyAkAra in his vArtika prasthAna. Sri SSS clarifies further
that there is no significant & objectionable difference between
bhAshyakAra & vArtikakAra in vedAntic methodology.
(b) That Swamigal does not hold "Anubhava" to be the "kingpin"; this is a
wrong quote about him.
> Ofcourse, Swamiji insisted the importance of sArvatrika pUrNAnubhava in
the brahma jignAsa & argued why vaiyuktikAnubhava (individual/personal
experiences like asamprajnAtha or nirvikalpa samAdhi) cannot be considered
as one of the pramANa-s in brahma jignAsa....But point to be noted here is
it is not at all at the cost of shruti as antya pramANa.
Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list