[Advaita-l] VedaprAmANya in Advaita
v.subrahmanian at gmail.com
Sat Apr 3 07:15:58 CDT 2010
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Murali Karamchedu <murali_m_k at msn.com>wrote:
> Here, the 'adi' after anubhava must mean other pramanas. If one were to
> read this
> as merely indicating the complementary nature of anubhava etc, then isn't
> a superfluous position to state; particularly considering how he contrasts
> this with
> dharmajijnasa, where too these other pramanas act in complementary roles?
> -Murali Manohar
> Dear Murali,
I realized that I had not answered this particular question of yours. The
Ratnaprabha commentary on the Bhashya observes:
Dharma is nitya-parokSha; ever-mediate and is something to be produced.
Hence there is no requirement of 'sAkShAtkAra', and it is impossible too.
The mere determining the meaning/methodology from Shruti is all that is
required to engage in the action (to produce the stated fruit). The
commentary also states: धर्मस्य अनुभवायोग्यत्वम् - dharma is incapable of
being experienced. (Here we should remember: at the time of engaging in
action. Of course, the fruit of dharma in the form of sukha, etc. is
experienceable, only at a future time/place.)
This is what distinguishes Brahmajijnaasaa from Dharmajijnaasaa. The
requirement of Shruti is common to both; the requirement of anubhava is the
additional requirement in BrahmajijnAsa.
One can look into the Ratnaprabha for a little more detail regarding shruti,
linga, vaakya, etc.
Om Tat Sat
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list