[Advaita-l] Fw: Re: [AIVS] about the secrets of blood: sacrifice and Ahimsa
sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 29 20:53:07 CDT 2009
--- On Mon, 9/28/09, Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [AIVS] about the secrets of blood: sacrifice and Ahimsa
To: AIVS at yahoogroups.com
Cc: WAVES-Vedic at yahoogroups.com, USBrahmins at yahoogroups.com,
Date: Monday, September 28, 2009, 6:40 PM
We have had discussion on a somewhat similar topic in another group also. There could have been the practice of ritual sacrifice of human beings in the ancient times in different societies. Was the event of the prophet Abaraham's trying to sacrifice his son an indication that before his times human sacrifice was practised in those regions? Purusamedha could also be one such ancient practice, if it really existed..
As regards animal sacrifice Manu has indeed said that animal can be killed during the sacrificial rites (Manu Smriti 5. 23 & 39). He also said that one should avoid meat and the meat eaters will be eaten up by their victims (5. 33 & 48). If however one wants to take meat one should first sprinkle water on it, with recitation of the holy mantras Manu Smriti (5.7 &27). To my knowledge,for that purpose a particular vedic verse, where Lord Vishnu is invoked as Mriga (Mrigendra), is recited. Even then there are restrictions like one should not take domesticated pig's meat.(5. 19)
But human sacrifice can be looked at from an entirely different angle also as the human flesh is not for consumption, even though there could have been some cannibals, who could have done that secretly. For whatever reason some people became threat to the society and in the ancient times there were no ways the society could keep those peolple away from harming the society due to logistical and other reasons. Exiling them to some remote distant land was not feasible in every society and life imprisonment was also not practicable in the ancient times. Probably some of the prisoners of war could have been sacrificed after much deliberation. As per the rules of war in the ancient times if the enemy surrenders he cannot be killed. So trials could have been held there for finding out if any of them deserved death punishment. Thus Willy nilly people had to be killed and what could be the better way to sacrifice them to the realm of the gods and the
manes, where they could be possibly / supposedly controlled. This could be the reason why the human sacrifice could have been practised with the usual restrictions but only with the prior proper approval of the relevant authorities. There could have been degradation of the practice, in the course of time, as every practice gets misused sometime or the other.
Actually the deity does not eat what is offered but only accepts it with the eyes. After the sacrifice the devotees eat what has been offered to the deity and the deity gets the taste of it (or can we say the deity is pleased?). There is a Sanskrit verse on this, in a book published by Swami Sukhobodhananda, if I remember correctly.
Sunil K. Bhattacharjya
--- On Mon, 9/28/09, Mehrdad <mhrd.azari at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Mehrdad <mhrd.azari at yahoo.com>
Subject: [AIVS] about the secrets of blood: sacrifice and Ahimsa
To: AIVS at yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, September 28, 2009, 11:43 AM
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list