[Advaita-l] Sankhya & Yoga
michael at shepherd87.fsnet.co.uk
Sat May 9 06:31:33 CDT 2009
Thanks. I think I get it ! it's a bit like Voltaire's 'Candide' -- one can
have the occasional democratic revelation, without necessarily being a
democrat or a Democrat !
From: advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
[mailto:advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org]On Behalf Of Jaldhar
Sent: 08 May 2009 20:33
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Sankhya & Yoga
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Michael Shepherd wrote:
> Would the implication be, that 'sankya' and 'yoga' were used as general
> terms for 'knowledge' and 'practice' before being codified (in a later
> ?) as 'systems' ? Thus their terms would be well known without yet such a
> codification, as a darshana ?
The standard explanation I like to give is the United States is a
democracy and also has a political party called Democrats. All Democrats
are democrats but all democrats are not Democrats. In other words, a
"capital-D" Democrat belongs to a particular darshana of "small-d"
That Samkhya/Yoga shares vocabulary and concepts with Vedanta is not
surprising as they do have a common root in Vedic tradition.
Shankaracharya does not deny this, he only says that their reading of
tradition is incorrect.
That "capital-S" Samkhyas share vocabulary and concepts with Gita,
Puranas, Ayurveda, Arthashastra etc. is not surprising as they have a
common root is a particular type of philosophical praxis we can call
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list