[Advaita-l] Pancikarana vs. Trivrtkarana (analysis)
Dr. Yadu Moharir
ymoharir at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 15 13:39:23 CDT 2009
The name "romasha" as mentioned is correct.
This suukta is known as "svanaya daanasuti". R^iShii for this suukta is kaxiivat aushija, King full name is given as "svanaya bhavayavya" and chhanda for the reference R^ichaa 6 & 7 is anuShTubh.
--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Bhadraiah Mallampalli <vaidix at hotmail.com> wrote:
From: Bhadraiah Mallampalli <vaidix at hotmail.com>
Subject: [Advaita-l] Pancikarana vs. Trivrtkarana (analysis)
To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 11:01 AM
The word romasha is suspect in the first place.
If something (hair in private parts) can not be explained by Shruti that becomes not_Brahman right? Can such a thing exist?
Quick access to your favorite MSN content and Windows Live with Internet Explorer 8.
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list