[Advaita-l] Advaita-l Digest, Vol 50, Issue 21 - anubhavAN^gaatvena

Guy Werlings werlings.guy at wanadoo.fr
Sat Jun 23 09:36:34 CDT 2007


Dear shrii Vidyasankar,



Thank you very much for your kind, rapid and precise answer as to 
anubhavAN^gaatvena.

I understand, however, that according to the Monier-Williams, aN^gatva means
n. a state of subordination or dependance, the being of secondary 
importance, the being unessential.

And this seems to me somewhat strange in the context. I had understood 
anubhavAN^gaatvena tarkaH as "reasoning based upon experience" - not 
"reasoning being of secondary importance to experience". Or should I 
understanding it as "reasoning depending upon experience"?

I should be very grateful to know what the true purport according to you is.

A "secondary question": in your anwer you mention aN^gatvena as the 
instrumental of aN^gatva,which I ought to know, but in the text in which I 
read the expression it seems to have been "anubhavAN^gaatvena" with a long a 
in ┬░gaatvena - is this just a typo?

dhanyavAdaH |

Guy W.



> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:58:12 -0400
> From: "Sundaresan, Vidyasankar (GE Infra, Water)"
> <vidyasankar.sundaresan at ge.com>
> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] anubhavAN^gaatvena
> To: <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> Message-ID:
> <B36E5920133AA24F8148E68B8836484B061D9067 at CINMLVEM23.e2k.ad.ge.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
>
> The split is anubhava + aN^gatvena only. The second word is the singluar
> instrumental declension of aN^gatva (e.g. rAma -> rAmeNa, lakshmaNa ->
> lakshmaNena, etc.)
>
> Best regards,
> Vidyasankar






More information about the Advaita-l mailing list