[Advaita-l] Concept of soul (Anbu sivam2)
raman.vishwanathan at gmail.com
Sun Aug 26 07:41:58 CDT 2007
Are not praana and mind part of the sookshma sareera (per the definition for
sookshma sareera by Sankara in Tattvabodha)?
> Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:24:09 -0500
> From: "Anbu sivam2" <anbesivam2 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Concept of soul
> To: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta"
> <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> <f65008470708242224u4e2ac12du14e1d47f6655cde4 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Pranaams to all.
> We all have three bodies - sthoola sareeram, sookshma sareeram and
> sareeram. In waking state all the three are experienced. In dream state
> the sthoola sareeram is absent from our experience. In deep sleep both
> sthoola sareeram and sookshma sareeram are not experienced. All these
> bodies even as we say are 'alive' are inert for they are driven by praaNa
> which is an inert entity.
> A chicken with its head cut off still jumps around for a little while just
> as a person waking from a nightmare experiences it for a little while in
> waking state. So much so there is a lingering 'life' in the blood
> extracted. This is merely the case of vaasana.
> Sthoola sareeram cannot exist without the other two sareerams. Sookshma
> sareeram can exist without sthoola sareeram but cannot exist without
> sareeram. KaaraNa sareeram can exist without sookshma sareeram but needs
> praana to sustain it. KaaraNa sareeram is the ignorant entity, the mind,
> which manifests avidya and vidya (yet ignorant only). It is the praaNa
> that enters and leaves the 'body' where the 'body' is understood as the
> sthoola sareeram. As it leaves the body, PraaNa takes the sookshma
> (along with the kaaraNa sareeram as sthoola sareeram cannot exist without
> the kaaraNa sareeram) and as it enters another sthoola sareeram it does so
> with the sookshma sareeram (and the kaaraNa sareeram). So it is right to
> say that it is the sookshma sareeram that transmigrates. This
> 'soul' in vaachyaartham is really unreal! In Lakshyaartham it is the
> the one without the second.
> In advaita our understanding is that there is nothing apart from the
> sentient entity called Aathman. Somehow I get the feeling that there is
> of hairsplitting arguments going on in this discussion.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list