garib_ram at yahoo.co.in
Mon Apr 24 09:16:06 CDT 2006
Thanks Jaldhar for your reply.
--- "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar at braincells.com> wrote:
> Needless to say we don't accept Madhva's
> interpretations as an
> authoritative source of our tradition.
I am not sure about this. As far as I understand, a
purvapaxin is refuted only on those issues where you
do not agree with him. As far as "apaurusheyatva"
issue is concerned, I do not know if any other school
of indian philosophy has anything better to offer than
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner now. Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list