ADMIN: RE: [Advaita-l] Narayana - Word
ravi at ambaa.org
Fri May 30 15:10:17 CDT 2003
Respected Sri Kalyanji:
As one of the Administrators of this list, I find your language in
this post unacceptable.
It is the traditional view that shruti is apaurushheya. R^ishhi-s are
only mantra drashhTa-s. Language of expression itself may have
influence of temporal effects in it. That does not imply composition
by human authors and the time of seeing the mantra-s does not
invalidate it or make it inferior. As long as you accept it as shruti,
you have no choice but accept its apaurushheya aspect and consider its
As far as this list is concerned, opinion of the traditional maTha-s,
such as Sringeri maTha alone matter and view of indologists are of NO
importance. Hence, let us base our discussion from that view point.
I hope you understand our position. And I request all the participants
to end this thread.
Thank you and if I have offended any of you by this post, I apologize
With best wishes,
> Rubbish. Have you read the Rig Veda or the Satapata brahmana? Unlike
> who was no important God in the Rg Veda samhita, Purusha(Narayana)
> started their careers as supreme gods. No where is Purusha
> Vishnu in the Rg Veda samhita.
> You dont even know why the 10th mandala is treated as the later
> There is evidece from linguistics. Linguists who have studied the
> of language in depth have told this. All in all it is similar to a
> scene investigation where you proceed based on the rules
> It is not as if the Rg veda is unauthored. Mandalas 2 to 7 which are
> considered to be the oldest are called family mandalas as they are
> by families of rishis. So much for the nonsense that you talk.
> Himalayan holiday! Waiting to be won.
> http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/summerfun/index.asp Find out more.
> want to unsubscribe or change your options? See:
> Need assistance? Contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list