[Advaita-l] Re: Advaita-l Digest, Vol 2, Issue 9
svidyasankar at hotmail.com
Thu Jun 5 20:25:45 CDT 2003
>Because, SriKrishna is explicitly saying "mAm". so, how can anyone take
>avyakta to be prakrti in 7.24 ?. So, in 7.24 it refers to Sri Krishna
>"avyakta nidhanAnyEva tatra kA paridEvanA".
>Here avyakta neither refers to SriKrishna nor to chit-prakrti, but only to
>Whoever told you that 'avyakta' always should refer to chit-prakrti only?
Nobody. Rather, my stance is that YOU are wrong in taking avyakta as prakRti
(or as you call it, cit-prakRti, whatever that may mean - we advaitin-s
don't use that term) in verse 12.1.
>Pl. do not argue with me for the sake of arguing.
>With all the shAstraic knowledge that you have, I am sure you knew this
>With all the advaita knowledge you know, probably you are also aware
>of the fact that, Geetha probably is the most difficult one to interpret
>from an advaita standpoint.
Please! What is that supposed to mean?
As far as I am concerned, gItA is advaitAmRtavarshiNI.
Finally, even if you take avyakta in 12.1 as SrI tattva, how does that imply
that brahma in verses 14.26-27 refer to mahAlakshmI? After all, in 14.26,
Krishna again says, "mAM".
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list