[Advaita-l] Bhakti, Bhagavata Purana & Sankara
venkat_advaita at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 1 23:11:15 CDT 2003
i find Sri Aniruddhan's reasons to be nice and heart taking. True, i have heard from Great Scholars that the Acharya used it only in the sense of
Paramatman = Parabrahman = Narayana
Thus, Narayana is in the Vedic sense of Brahman and not the puranic shanka chakra Gada Nama dhari of the popular sense.
Thank you anirudhan.
Sankaran Aniruddhan <ani at ee.washington.edu> wrote:
> my point is why the Bhashyakara Pada is silent in his
> Bhashyas throughout, about anyone other than Narayana.
> what is the meaning of this conspicious absense. thats
> all. nothing more than that.
Possible reason #1: Bhagavatpada may not be using words like
vishnu, narayana etc in their popular connotation (which
refers only to a particular form of god). He may be using
them considering their basic meaning. For example, Vishnu
means sarva-vyApi or all-pervading. So when He says Vishnu,
He is referring to the all-pervading Atman.
Possible reason #2: It is possible that Bhagavatpada's
ishta-devata was Vishnu, so He salutes Him in his bhashyas.
Or maybe, being Parameshwara's incarnation, He didn't want
to salute Himself! :-)
Sruti smRti purANAnAm Alayam karuNAlayam
namAmi bhagavatpAda Sam.karam lokaSam.karam
want to unsubscribe or change your options? See:
Need assistance? Contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
Thanks & Regards,
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list