srikrishna_ghadiyaram at YAHOO.COM
Sat Sep 14 14:27:38 CDT 2002
Hari Om !!
--- Ashish Chandra <ramkisno at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 21:37:53 -0700, Jagannath
> The question is really for Jaldhar but what I have
> been saying is that
> Advaita, the adjective, when used alone, could imply
> nothing else but
> Brahman (which alone is non-dual, blimishless etc.).
> However, Advaita in
> and of itself does not imply the term Advaita
If 'Advaita' implies 'Brahman', then 'Advaita' should
be a 'Noun' and not an 'adjective' right ?
But, what Sri Jaladhar is saying is that 'Advaita' is
an 'adjective' and the 'vedanta' word following is
implied, as in the 'Red' is running which is actually
supposed to express 'Red horse' is running.
Om Namo Narayanaya !!
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list