gourish at INTERNET1.NET
Fri Apr 30 11:21:44 CDT 1999
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999 04:07:33 -0700, Tim Gerchmez <fewtch at ESKIMO.COM> wrote:
>"Brahman" both exists and does not exist. It does not exist because it is
>formless, spaceless and timeless, all of which are necessary for a
>definition of "existence."
This cannot be true. Brahman is Consciousness, and IT ALWAYS EXISTS.
As the Gita puts it: naasato vidyate bhaavo naabhaavo vidyate sataH . 2:16
Of the non-existent there is no coming to be;
of the existent there is no ceasing to be.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list