goode at DPW.COM
Tue Sep 1 23:39:53 CDT 1998
At 03:13 PM 9/1/98 PDT, nanda chandran wrote:
>Srinivas Sista writes :
>>Since your definition of consciousness suffers from error, you are
>>getting into all sorts of confusion.
>I took a look at the thesaurus. Consciousness is equated with all these
>words : awareness, mindfulness, cognizance, knowledge. And AFAIK, none
>of these words can be explained without a subject and an object.
>So please explain the difference between consciousness and being
Let me try -- consciousness is usually spoken of as awareness that is
impersonal, not owned or posessed by any entity. Being conscious on the
other hand, is a possession by an entity or is an attribute of an entity.
How about an example of the impersonal kind of consciousnes.... A body is
material, physical; a mind is too at a subtle level. Consciousness is not
material. It is that in which objects appear, some of those objects are
body/mind mechanisms. So this kind of non-physical consciouness, being
non-physical, cannot have a location, or movement, and time doesn't apply
to it. If we can agree on that, then how can consciousness be owned by a
body/mind organism? That is, how can consciousness be personal?
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list