On rivers and mountains

[Nanda Kumar]

>> Ramana loved Arunachula - a
>> mountain. If mountains and rivers are not seen then the Advaitan
misses out
>> on his own creation!
>
>But the Advaitin doesn't care for his own or anyone elses creation.

But isn't the realized person supposed to see himself in everything and
everything in himself? So isn't the point that, even if he might see the
physical form of the mountain or river, he recognizes it for the Brahman
in it, which is a part of him too?