Dispassion

M & E Shearn peacewrk at SNET.NET
Sat Jun 8 15:25:45 CDT 1996


At 12:33 PM 6/8/96 -0400, you wrote:
>At 11:16 PM 6/7/96 -0400, M & E Shearn wrote:
>
> >> The attachment of internal mind (A) to external world (~A)
> >> is a logical expression of their inherent unity.
> >
> > IAN,
> > may I ask who is the witness to these?
>
>I am
>
> > Who is the comentator?
>
>I am
>
> > If I am is
> > nobody who knows it?
>
>
>I, I am nobody / null
>
>good (+) commentary is good (+) only relative to bad (-)
>
>   (+) implies => (-), (+) <=> (-) => union => 0 => null
>
>thus all commentary is not other than I am
>
>
> >> The attachment of internal mind (A) to external world (~A)
> >> is a logical expression of their inherent unity.
>
> > What is the *their* which posesses a unity?
>
>the whole, I am the whole = (A + ~A)
>
> > Who's logic
> > is it?
>
>nobody's
>
> > Internal and external are two?
>
>internal and external are unitary
>

 how can I am say this is that and that is not that?
Iam is both = and ~. Who sees it as such? If you say nobody who says it?
Nobody can not say something? Too deep for this one.
in Him
love
e.j.



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list